log图标

toefl.viplgw.cn

  • 使用手机注册
  • 使用邮箱注册
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

已有账号? 登录到雷哥托福
log图标
  • 使用手机找回密码
  • 使用邮箱找回密码
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

加入生词本

listen

英['lɪs(ə)n] 美['lɪsn]
vi. 听,倾听;听从,听信
n. 听,倾听

已添加
×

我要举报草莓小菇凉评论

用户头像
草莓小菇凉:说的非常好,十分有道理,棒棒棒!

06-08 15:44:55

请选择举报类型:

举报电话:400 1816 180    举报QQ:2095453331
×
logo图标
分享到雷哥托福

分享成功图标分享成功

邀请名师点评成功,管理员正在安排老师进行点评。

继续做题 返回首页
支付雷豆失败图标 雷豆余额不足 购买雷豆 返回
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消

下载雷哥托福APP

你的托福备考神器

雷哥托福

雷哥网托福APP

你的托福备考神器

去下载

TPO54托福阅读passage2 Overkill of the North American Megafauna 原文文本【雷哥托福】

2018-07-31 19:18:32 发布 来源:雷哥托福

本文提供的内容是托福tpo雷哥托福整理TPO54阅读passage2 Overkill of the North American Megafauna 原文文本,想要获得完整版TPO54的真题答案解析,添加小助手微信号:lgtoefl666 获取,或者同学们可以来雷哥托福官网在线模考练习。

获取真题答案及解析请点击:TPO54阅读passage2 Overkill of the North American Megafauna 真题题目及答案 


Passage2

 

Overkill of the North American Megafauna

正文

Thousands of years ago, in North America's past, all of its megafauna—large mammals such as mammoths and giant bears—disappeared. One proposed explanation for this event is that when the first Americans migrated over from Asia, they hunted the megafauna to extinction. These people, known as the  Clovis  society after a site where their distinctive spear points were first found, would have been able to use this food source to expand their population and fill the continent rapidly. Yet many scientists argue against this "Pleistocene overkill" hypothesis. Modern humans have certainly been capable of such drastic effects on animals, but could ancient people with little more than stone spears similarly have caused the extinction of numerous species of animals? Thirty-five genera or groups of species (and many individual species) suffered extinction in North America around 11,000 B.C., soon after the appearance and expansion of Paleo-lndians throughout the Americas (27 genera disappeared completely, and another 8 became locally extinct, surviving only outside North America).

■Although the climate changed at the end of the Pleistocene, warming trends had happened before.

■A period of massive extinction of large mammals like that seen about 11,000 years ago had not occurred during the previous 400,000 years, despite these changes.

■The only apparently significant difference in the Americas 11,000 years ago was the presence of human hunters of these large mammals.

■Was this coincidence or cause-and-effect?

We do not know. Ecologist Paul S. Martin has championed  the  model  that associates  the  extinction   of   large   mammals  at  the  end  of   the   Pleistocene with

human predation. With researcher J.  E. Mosimann, he has co-authored a work  in which a computer model showed that in around 300 years, given the right conditions, a small influx of hunters into eastern Beringia 12,000 years ago could   have   spread   across   North   America   in   a   wave  and  wiped  out  game animals to feed their burgeoning population.

The researchers ran the model several ways, always beginning with a population of 100 humans in Edmonton, in Alberta, Canada, at 11,500 years ago. Assuming different initial North American big-game-animal populations (75-150 million animals) and different population growth rates for the human settlers (0.65%-3.5%), and varying kill rates, Mosimann and Martin derived figures of between  279  and 1,157 years from initial contact to big-game extinction.

Many scholars continue to support this scenario. For example, geologist Larry Agenbroad has mapped the locations of dated Clovis sites alongside  the  distribution of dated sites where the remains of wooly mammoths have been found in both archaeological and purely paleontological contexts. These distributions

show remarkable synchronicity (occurrence at the same time).

There are, however, many problems with this model. Significantly,  though  a  few sites are quite impressive, there really is very little archaeological evidence to support it. Writing in 1982, Martin himself admitted the paucity of evidence; for example, at that point, the remains of only 38 individual  mammoths  had  been  found at Clovis sites. In the years since, few additional mammoths have been added to the list; there are still fewer than 20 Clovis sites where the remains of one or more mammoths have been recovered, a minuscule proportion of the millions that necessarily would have had to have been slaughtered within the overkill scenario. Though Martin claims the lack of evidence actually supports his model —the evidence is sparse because the spread of humans and the extinction of animals occurred so quickly— this argument seems weak. And how could we ever disprove  it? As archaeologist Donald Grayson points out, in other cases where extinction resulted from the quick spread of human hunters—for  example,  the  extinction  of the moa, the large flightless bird of New Zealand— archaeological evidence in the form of remains is abundant. Grayson has also shown that the evidence is not so clear that all or even most of the large herbivores in late Pleistocene  America  became extinct after the appearance of Clovis. Of the 35 extinct genera, only  8  can be confidently assigned an extinction date of between 12,000 and 10,000 years ago. Many of the older genera, Grayson argues, may have succumbed before 12,000 B.C., at least half a century before the Clovis showed up in the American West.


获取题目及答案解析请点击:TPO54托福阅读passage2 Overkill of the North American Megafauna真题题目及答案

上一篇:TPO54托福阅读passage1 The Commerci 下一篇:1月托福写作预测题




雷哥托福>托福机经>TPO54托福阅读passage2 Overkill of the North American Megafauna 原文文本【雷哥托福】

TPO54托福阅读passage2 Overkill of the North American Megafauna 原文文本【雷哥托福】

2018-07-31 19:18:32 发布 来源: 雷哥托福 4939阅读

本文提供的内容是托福tpo雷哥托福整理TPO54阅读passage2 Overkill of the North American Megafauna 原文文本,想要获得完整版TPO54的真题答案解析,添加小助手微信号:lgtoefl666 获取,或者同学们可以来雷哥托福官网在线模考练习。

获取真题答案及解析请点击:TPO54阅读passage2 Overkill of the North American Megafauna 真题题目及答案 


Passage2

 

Overkill of the North American Megafauna

正文

Thousands of years ago, in North America's past, all of its megafauna—large mammals such as mammoths and giant bears—disappeared. One proposed explanation for this event is that when the first Americans migrated over from Asia, they hunted the megafauna to extinction. These people, known as the  Clovis  society after a site where their distinctive spear points were first found, would have been able to use this food source to expand their population and fill the continent rapidly. Yet many scientists argue against this "Pleistocene overkill" hypothesis. Modern humans have certainly been capable of such drastic effects on animals, but could ancient people with little more than stone spears similarly have caused the extinction of numerous species of animals? Thirty-five genera or groups of species (and many individual species) suffered extinction in North America around 11,000 B.C., soon after the appearance and expansion of Paleo-lndians throughout the Americas (27 genera disappeared completely, and another 8 became locally extinct, surviving only outside North America).

■Although the climate changed at the end of the Pleistocene, warming trends had happened before.

■A period of massive extinction of large mammals like that seen about 11,000 years ago had not occurred during the previous 400,000 years, despite these changes.

■The only apparently significant difference in the Americas 11,000 years ago was the presence of human hunters of these large mammals.

■Was this coincidence or cause-and-effect?

We do not know. Ecologist Paul S. Martin has championed  the  model  that associates  the  extinction   of   large   mammals  at  the  end  of   the   Pleistocene with

human predation. With researcher J.  E. Mosimann, he has co-authored a work  in which a computer model showed that in around 300 years, given the right conditions, a small influx of hunters into eastern Beringia 12,000 years ago could   have   spread   across   North   America   in   a   wave  and  wiped  out  game animals to feed their burgeoning population.

The researchers ran the model several ways, always beginning with a population of 100 humans in Edmonton, in Alberta, Canada, at 11,500 years ago. Assuming different initial North American big-game-animal populations (75-150 million animals) and different population growth rates for the human settlers (0.65%-3.5%), and varying kill rates, Mosimann and Martin derived figures of between  279  and 1,157 years from initial contact to big-game extinction.

Many scholars continue to support this scenario. For example, geologist Larry Agenbroad has mapped the locations of dated Clovis sites alongside  the  distribution of dated sites where the remains of wooly mammoths have been found in both archaeological and purely paleontological contexts. These distributions

show remarkable synchronicity (occurrence at the same time).

There are, however, many problems with this model. Significantly,  though  a  few sites are quite impressive, there really is very little archaeological evidence to support it. Writing in 1982, Martin himself admitted the paucity of evidence; for example, at that point, the remains of only 38 individual  mammoths  had  been  found at Clovis sites. In the years since, few additional mammoths have been added to the list; there are still fewer than 20 Clovis sites where the remains of one or more mammoths have been recovered, a minuscule proportion of the millions that necessarily would have had to have been slaughtered within the overkill scenario. Though Martin claims the lack of evidence actually supports his model —the evidence is sparse because the spread of humans and the extinction of animals occurred so quickly— this argument seems weak. And how could we ever disprove  it? As archaeologist Donald Grayson points out, in other cases where extinction resulted from the quick spread of human hunters—for  example,  the  extinction  of the moa, the large flightless bird of New Zealand— archaeological evidence in the form of remains is abundant. Grayson has also shown that the evidence is not so clear that all or even most of the large herbivores in late Pleistocene  America  became extinct after the appearance of Clovis. Of the 35 extinct genera, only  8  can be confidently assigned an extinction date of between 12,000 and 10,000 years ago. Many of the older genera, Grayson argues, may have succumbed before 12,000 B.C., at least half a century before the Clovis showed up in the American West.


获取题目及答案解析请点击:TPO54托福阅读passage2 Overkill of the North American Megafauna真题题目及答案

上一篇:TPO54托福阅读passage1 The Commerci

下一篇:1月托福写作预测题

热门文章

推荐课程