关闭图标
log图标

toefl.viplgw.cn

  • 使用手机注册
  • 使用邮箱注册
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

已有账号? 登录到雷哥托福
关闭图标
log图标
  • 使用手机找回密码
  • 使用邮箱找回密码
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

又想起来了
加入生词本

listen

英['lɪs(ə)n] 美['lɪsn]
vi. 听,倾听;听从,听信
n. 听,倾听

已添加
×

我要举报草莓小菇凉评论

用户头像
草莓小菇凉:说的非常好,十分有道理,棒棒棒!

06-08 15:44:55

请选择举报类型:

举报电话:400 1816 180    举报QQ:2095453331
×
logo图标
分享到雷哥托福

分享成功图标分享成功

邀请名师点评成功,管理员正在安排老师进行点评。

继续做题 返回首页
支付雷豆失败图标 雷豆余额不足 购买雷豆 返回
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消

文章结构

TPO 10-L1 .Whales 点击收藏

标准

  • 高音
  • 静音
  • 句子
    精听
  • 全文
    精听
  • 听写
    模式
  • 点击查看本句

    听写本句 再播一遍 下一句
  • 点击查看全文

    再播一遍本文

    Listen to part of a lecture in a Marine Biology Class.

    We know whales are mammals and that they evolved from land creatures.

    So the mystery is figuring out how they became ocean dwellers.

    Because until recently there was no fossil record of what we call "the missing link", that is evidence of species that show the transition between land-dwelling mammals and today's whales.

    Fortunately, some recent fossil discoveries have made the picture a little bit clearer.

    For example, a few years back in Pakistan, they found a skull of a wolf-like creature.

    It's about fifty million years old.

    Scientists had seen this wolf-like creature before, but this skull was different.

    The ear area of the skull had characteristics seen only in aquatic mammals, specifically whales.

    Err, well, then also in Pakistan they found a fossil of another creature, which we call Ambulocetus natans.

    That's a mouthful,eh?

    The name Ambulocetus natans comes from Latin of course, and means "walking whale that swims".

    It clearly had four limbs that could have been used for walking.

    It also had a long thin tail, typical of mammals, something we don't see in today's whales.

    But it also had a long skeletal structure, and that long skeletal structure suggests that it was aquatic.

    And very recently, in Egypt, they found skeleton of Basilosaurus.

    Basilosaurus was a creature that we've already known about for over a hundred years.

    And it has been linked to modern whales because of its long whale-like body.

    But this new fossil find showed a full set of leg bones, something we didn't have before.

    The legs were too small to be useful.

    They weren't even connected to its pelvis and couldn't have supported its weight.

    But it clearly shows Basilosaurus’s evolution from land creatures.

    So that's a giant step in the right direction.

    Even better, it establishes Ambulocetus as a clear link between the wolf-like creature and Basilosaurus.

    Now these discoveries don't completely solve the mystery.

    I mean, Ambulocetus is a mammal that shows a sort of bridge between walking on land and swimming.

    But it also is very different from the whales we know today.

    So, really we are working with just a few pieces of a big puzzle.

    Emm, a related debate involved some recent DNA studies.

    Remember, DNA is the genetic code for any organism, and when the DNA from two different species is similar, it suggests that those two species are related.

    And when we compared some whale's DNA with DNA from some other species, we got quite a surprise.

    The DNA suggests that whales are descendants of the hippopotamus.

    Yes the hippopotamus! Well, that came as a bit of shock.

    I mean that a four-legged land and river dweller could be the evolutionary source of a completely aquatic creature up to twenty five times its size.

    Unfortunately, this revelation about the hippopotamus apparently contradicts the fossil record, which suggests that the hippopotamus is only a very distant relative of the whale, not an ancestor.

    And of course as I mentioned that the whales are descendant not from hippos but from that distant wolf-like creature.

    So we have contradictory evidence.

    And more research might just raise more questions and create more controversies.

    At any rate, we have a choice.

    We can believe the molecular data, the DNA, or we can believe the skeleton trail.

    But unfortunately, probably not both.

    Um, and there have been some other interesting findings from DNA research.

    For a long time, we assumed that all whales that had teeth, including sperm whales and killer whales were closely related to one another, and the same for the toothless whales, like the bule whale and other baleen whales.

    We assumed that they be closely related.

    But recent DNA studies suggest that's not the case at all.

    The sperm whale is actually closely related to the baleen whale, and it's only distantly related to the toothed-whales.

    So that was the real surprise to all of us.

    • special
    ☞查看答案 再播一遍

联系雷哥托福

全国免费咨询热线:400 1816 180

预约托福考试规划师