课前
BEFORE CLASS
课前测评,了解情况,获取针对性学习计划
领取内部学习资料、了解课程安排以及服务内容
领取学习、复习计划,完成开课前内容学习
课中
IN THE CLASS
实时反馈学习结果,及时调整学习、复习计划
及时完成课后学习内容、以及课上知识点复习
学习问题反馈,及时给到老师在课上予以解答
课后
AFTER CLASS
根据同学学习情况,提供课后学习计划、冲刺学习计划等
保障课后服务执行到位(答疑服务、课程回放、后续课程、报名指导等)
考试后免费分析成绩和提供专业的针对性提升方案
双系统教学体系
三重保障 为700+保驾护航
五阶段全程陪伴
科学的课程设计,10年教学经验积累,实力研发针对GMAT考试规则的课程体系
核心方法
数学4大考点,27个知识点;SC8大考点,
7种核心关系,CR5大推理模型8大题型;
RC6种阅读关系3大类考点。
解决突破
方法灵活应用,轻松应对各类考点的高阶
难题。
核心方法课
针对GMAT考试分项,搭建解题框架,
逐一击破考点。
解决突破课
针对各种考点变化,构造解题思路,
灵活应对各类高阶难题。
硬核资深讲师团队+全班型覆盖
资深教师阵容,每一位老师都有丰富的教学、授课经验。 课程选择丰富,适合自己的才是最好的。
GMAT资料合集;执行保障300难题/OG中文解析;1对1学管老师;私人订制学习计划; 学习进度分析报告;考前机经课;资深讲师解答; 学习社群;刷题/单词APP;仿真模考系统; 换库日历;考位查询小程序。
科学课程体系,整体提升出分效率。 紧跟GMAT考点,构建解题思维,课前课中课后三阶段全程聚焦学习进度。
1对1个性化复习方案,每周定期跟进,动态调整复习节奏
每日学习计划
每周两次跟进
动态调整复习节奏
全程监督辅导
1v1个性化复习方案
申友雷哥GMAT高分时刻
学生评语
王同学
强烈推荐Verna老师的SC直播课和Amanda老师的SC录播课,两个全都看完有种打通任督二脉的感觉,老师们商科的时候细节扣的很细
孙同学
我好喜欢Cheryl老师啊,每节课的内容都能直击痛点,让我的CR有种醍醐灌顶的感觉,真的推翻了我之前的自学方法,效果特别好
黄同学
elisha老师的课我爱了,感觉每一句话都是重点,他讲东西我就是很愿意听,而且不会走神想其他的
陆同学
Verna老师上课互动特别多,打call!,上她的课能让我在课上就发现思路问题并及时纠正,细节扣得很细
张同学
Kevin和amanda老师的课不愧是申友王牌,就上了六节1对1让我出分740,真的是GMAT提分的一剂猛药
杨同学
首先amanda老师俺女神,让我SC有了思路,做题也轻松不少。我觉得语文还是不在于刷题在于思路!数学的话也要先熟悉考点和知识点再刷题
申友雷哥GMAT讲师
申友雷哥GMAT备考宝典
申友雷哥GMAT面授地址
MAT+旨在更好的服务于用户帮助学生能够快速上分,现已在上海、北京、广州、成都、武汉等地开设分公司
考生可以更好的于GMAT+面对面互动学习
上海申友教室
上海市徐汇区文定路208号德必徐家汇WE艺术楼2楼205
北京申友教室
北京市朝阳区雅宝路7号 E园EPARK大厦504
长沙申友教室
湖南省长沙市开福区万达广场-C3 1510室
广州申友教室
广州市天河区体育东路116号财富广场西塔1206
重庆申友教室
重庆市渝中区邹容路68号大都会广场16楼1603-1604室
青岛申友教室
青岛市南区香港中路36号招银大厦1006
成都申友教室
四川省成都市锦江区春熙路街道梓潼桥正街25号西部文化产业中心7-8楼
武汉申友教室
湖北省武汉市洪山区珞喻路889号光谷融众国际23层2302室
申友雷哥GMAT高分教材
申友GMAT长难句之光
GMAT阅读高分攻略
申友GMAT语法真题名师解析
申友GMAT700+系列阅读紫皮书
申友GMAT第九代教材,CR+Q+IR部分
申友GMAT第九代高分教材,AWA+RC部分
请填写手机号
关闭
Copyright © 2021 All Right Reserved 申友雷哥教育 版权所有 沪ICP备17005516号-3 免责声明 互联网经营许可证编号:沪B2-20210282
toefl.viplgw.cn
手机号不能为空!
验证码不能为空!
用户名不能为空!
密码不能为空!
邮箱不能为空!
验证码不能为空!
用户名不能为空!
密码不能为空!
英['lɪs(ə)n] 美['lɪsn]
vi. 听,倾听;听从,听信
n. 听,倾听
你的托福备考神器
题库>听力-6462 -Official 21
请联系小助手查看完整题目
(微信号:lgtoefl77)
Listen to part of a lecture in a biology class.
Probably back in some previous biology course you learned that snakes evolved from lizards, and that the first snakes weren't venomous and then along came more advanced snakes, the venomous snakes. Ok, venomous snakes are the ones that secrete poisonous substances or venom, like the snakes of the viper family or cobras, then there is non-venomous snakes like constrictors and pythons. Another family of snakes, the colubrids, don't really fit neatly into either category though. Colubrids, and you probably learned this too, although they are often classified as venomous snakes, they are actually generally non-venomous. They are classified as venomous snakes because they resemble them, their advanced features more than the other non-venomous snakes.
Now, what if I told you that there is a good chance that most everything I just said is wrong? Well, everything except the part about snakes evolving from lizards. See, the basic theory about snake evolution has been challenged by a recent study that revealed a whole new understanding of evolutionary relationship for reptiles, you know, which reptiles descended from which ancestors. The researchers study the proteins in the venom genes of various species of colubrids. Emm... snake venom is a mixture of proteins, some toxic, poisonous, and some not. By analyzing the DNA, the genetic material of the proteins, the researchers could focus on the toxic genes and use them to trace the evolution of snake venom, and from this, the evolution of snakes.
Traditionally, to understanding evolutionary relationships, we looked at various easily observed physical characteristics of animals, their skeleton, the size of their brain, and... and then classify them based on similarities and differences. The problem with this method is that characteristics that appear similar may actually have developed in quite different ways. For example, some venoms are chemical-based, and others are bacteria-based, so they clearly had to have developed along different routes and may not be as closely related as we thought.
Now, and not everyone will agree about this.The classification based on DNA seems to be much more reliable. Ok, back to the research. The researchers found that venom evolved before snakes even existed, about a hundred million years before. Now, a couple of venomous lizards were included in this study. And the researchers found some of the same DNA in their venom as in the snakes' venom. This suggested that the common ancestor of all snakes was actually a venomous lizard, which means that actually, according to this research, anyway, in terms of the snakes' ancestry, there is no such thing as a non-venomous snake, not even colubrids. What separates colubrids from other snakes we have been classifying is venomous, is not the lack of venom, but the lack of an effective way to deliver the venom into its prey. In most venomous snakes, like vipers and cobras, the venom is used to catch and immobilize the prey; but in colubrids, venom drips onto the prey only after the prey is in the snake's mouth. So for colubrids, the venom must serve some other purpose, maybe linked to digesting prey. As the different families of venomous snakes evolved, the teeth moved forward, becoming larger, and the venom becoming stronger, so the evolution of the obvious venomous snakes, like cobras and vipers, is about the evolution of an efficient delivery system, not so much the evolution of the venom itself.
So, if there are no truly non-venomous snakes, were the so-called non-venomous snakes, like constrictors and pythons, were they venomous at some point in their evolution? Well, that's not clear at this point. Constrictors have evolved to kill their prey by crushing, but perhaps they once were venomous, and then at some point their venom-producing apparatus wasn't needed anymore, so it gradually disappeared.There's one species of snake, the brown tree snake, that uses both constriction and venom, depending on its prey. So, well, it is possible.
So, we have these new concepts of snakes' evolution and a new DNA database, all these information on the genetic makeup of snake venom. And what we have learned from this has led researchers to believe that venom proteins may have some exciting applications in the field of medical research. You see, venom alters biological functions in the same way certain drugs do, and the big benefit of drugs made from snakes venom would be that they target only certain cells, so maybe that'll create fewer side effects. Now, it sounds far-fetched, venom is the basis for human drugs. So far, only one protein has been targeted for study as a potential drug, but who knows, maybe someday.
当前版本由 十三个 更新于2018-12-02 13:42:41 感谢由 十三个 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。
正确答案:B 定位原文:Probably back in some previous biology course you learned that snakes evolved from lizards, and that the first snakes weren’t venomous and then along came more advanced snakes, the venomous snakes… other non-venomous snakes. See, the basic theory about snake evolution has been challenged by a recent study that revealed a whole new understanding of evolutionary relationship for reptiles… 解析:开篇整个第一段都是在说蛇的分类,接着讲了一个关于蛇进化的新的理论,然后文章的后面部分讲述了一个实验室如何来证明这个理论的,所以综合选项,正确答案应该是B。
我有更好解析
取消
提交
推荐文章
题库>听力-6462 -Official 21
请联系小助手查看完整题目
(微信号:lgtoefl77)
Listen to part of a lecture in a biology class.
Probably back in some previous biology course you learned that snakes evolved from lizards, and that the first snakes weren't venomous and then along came more advanced snakes, the venomous snakes. Ok, venomous snakes are the ones that secrete poisonous substances or venom, like the snakes of the viper family or cobras, then there is non-venomous snakes like constrictors and pythons. Another family of snakes, the colubrids, don't really fit neatly into either category though. Colubrids, and you probably learned this too, although they are often classified as venomous snakes, they are actually generally non-venomous. They are classified as venomous snakes because they resemble them, their advanced features more than the other non-venomous snakes.
Now, what if I told you that there is a good chance that most everything I just said is wrong? Well, everything except the part about snakes evolving from lizards. See, the basic theory about snake evolution has been challenged by a recent study that revealed a whole new understanding of evolutionary relationship for reptiles, you know, which reptiles descended from which ancestors. The researchers study the proteins in the venom genes of various species of colubrids. Emm... snake venom is a mixture of proteins, some toxic, poisonous, and some not. By analyzing the DNA, the genetic material of the proteins, the researchers could focus on the toxic genes and use them to trace the evolution of snake venom, and from this, the evolution of snakes.
Traditionally, to understanding evolutionary relationships, we looked at various easily observed physical characteristics of animals, their skeleton, the size of their brain, and... and then classify them based on similarities and differences. The problem with this method is that characteristics that appear similar may actually have developed in quite different ways. For example, some venoms are chemical-based, and others are bacteria-based, so they clearly had to have developed along different routes and may not be as closely related as we thought.
Now, and not everyone will agree about this.The classification based on DNA seems to be much more reliable. Ok, back to the research. The researchers found that venom evolved before snakes even existed, about a hundred million years before. Now, a couple of venomous lizards were included in this study. And the researchers found some of the same DNA in their venom as in the snakes' venom. This suggested that the common ancestor of all snakes was actually a venomous lizard, which means that actually, according to this research, anyway, in terms of the snakes' ancestry, there is no such thing as a non-venomous snake, not even colubrids. What separates colubrids from other snakes we have been classifying is venomous, is not the lack of venom, but the lack of an effective way to deliver the venom into its prey. In most venomous snakes, like vipers and cobras, the venom is used to catch and immobilize the prey; but in colubrids, venom drips onto the prey only after the prey is in the snake's mouth. So for colubrids, the venom must serve some other purpose, maybe linked to digesting prey. As the different families of venomous snakes evolved, the teeth moved forward, becoming larger, and the venom becoming stronger, so the evolution of the obvious venomous snakes, like cobras and vipers, is about the evolution of an efficient delivery system, not so much the evolution of the venom itself.
So, if there are no truly non-venomous snakes, were the so-called non-venomous snakes, like constrictors and pythons, were they venomous at some point in their evolution? Well, that's not clear at this point. Constrictors have evolved to kill their prey by crushing, but perhaps they once were venomous, and then at some point their venom-producing apparatus wasn't needed anymore, so it gradually disappeared.There's one species of snake, the brown tree snake, that uses both constriction and venom, depending on its prey. So, well, it is possible.
So, we have these new concepts of snakes' evolution and a new DNA database, all these information on the genetic makeup of snake venom. And what we have learned from this has led researchers to believe that venom proteins may have some exciting applications in the field of medical research. You see, venom alters biological functions in the same way certain drugs do, and the big benefit of drugs made from snakes venom would be that they target only certain cells, so maybe that'll create fewer side effects. Now, it sounds far-fetched, venom is the basis for human drugs. So far, only one protein has been targeted for study as a potential drug, but who knows, maybe someday.
写解析
十三个 更新于2018-12-02 13:42:41
正确答案:B 定位原文:Probably back in some previous biology course you learned that snakes evolved from lizards, and that the first snakes weren’t venomous and then along came more advanced snakes, the venomous snakes… other non-venomous snakes. See, the basic theory about snake evolution has been challenged by a recent study that revealed a whole new understanding of evolutionary relationship for reptiles… 解析:开篇整个第一段都是在说蛇的分类,接着讲了一个关于蛇进化的新的理论,然后文章的后面部分讲述了一个实验室如何来证明这个理论的,所以综合选项,正确答案应该是B。
立即评论
推荐文章
回复评论
复制评论
解析提交成功,正在审核中
知道了
您已提交评论成功
答案都没有怎么前进?
知道了
此来源单项已做完
知道了
是否确认删除?
取消
删除
草莓小菇凉:说的非常好,十分有道理,棒棒棒!
06-08 15:44:55