关闭图标
log图标

toefl.viplgw.cn

  • 使用手机注册
  • 使用邮箱注册
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

已有账号? 登录到雷哥托福
关闭图标
log图标
  • 使用手机找回密码
  • 使用邮箱找回密码
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

又想起来了
加入生词本

listen

英['lɪs(ə)n] 美['lɪsn]
vi. 听,倾听;听从,听信
n. 听,倾听

已添加
×

我要举报草莓小菇凉评论

用户头像
草莓小菇凉:说的非常好,十分有道理,棒棒棒!

06-08 15:44:55

请选择举报类型:

举报电话:400 1816 180    举报QQ:2095453331
×
logo图标
分享到雷哥托福

分享成功图标分享成功

邀请名师点评成功,管理员正在安排老师进行点评。

继续做题 返回首页
支付雷豆失败图标 雷豆余额不足 购买雷豆 返回
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消

TPO 17 -Prehistoric Art Dating

试音图标
查看听力原文

Listen to part of lecture in an art history class.

Good morning, ready to continue our review of prehistory art?Today, we will be covering the Upper Paleolithic Period, which I am roughly defining as the period from 35000 to 8000 B.C.A lot of those cave drawings you have all seen come from this period. But We also be talking about portable work of art, things that could be carried around from place to place.Here is one example.This sculpture is called "the lady with the hood" and it was caved from ivory, probably a mammoth's tusk.Its age is a bit of a mystery.According to one source, it dates from 22000 B.C.But other sources claimed it has been dated closer to 30000 B.C. Em, Amy?

Why don't we know the exact date when this head was made?

That is a fair question.We are talking about prehistory here.So obviously, the artists didn't put a signature or a date on anything they did.So how do we know when this figure was carved.

Last semester, I took an archaeology class, and we spend a lot of time on, eh, studying ways to date things.One technique I remember was using the location of an object to dated it, like how deep it was burried.

That would be stratigraphy.Stratigraphy is used for dating portable art.When archaeologists are digging at the site, they make very careful notes about which stratum, which layer of earth they find things in.And, you know, the general rule is that the oldest layers are at the lowest level.But this only works if the site hasn't been touched, and the layers are intact.A problem with this dating method is that an object could have been carried around, used for several generations before it was discarded.So it might be much older than the layer or even the site where it was found.The stratification technique gives us the minimum age of an object, which isn't necessarily its true age.Eh... Tom, in your archaeology class, did you talk about radiocarbon dating?

Yeah, we did.That had to do with chemical analysis, something to do with measuring the amount of radiocarbon that's left in organic stuff.Because we know how fast radiocarbon decays, we can figure out the age of the organic material.

The key word there is organic.Is art made of organic material?

Well, you said the "Lady with hood" was carved out of ivory.That's organic.

Absolutely. Any other examples?

Well, when they did those cave drawings.Did they use like charcoal or maybe colors, dyes made from plants. 

Fortunately they did, at least some of the time. So it turns out that radiocarbon dating works for a lot of prehistoric art.But again, there is a problem.This technique destroys what it analyzes, so you have to chip off bits of object for testing.Ah, obviously where you reluctant to do that in some cases. And part from that, there is another problems.The date tells you the age of the material, say, a bone or a tree, the object is made from, but not the date when the artist actually created it.So with radiocarbon dating, we get the maximum possible age for the object, but it could be younger.OK, let's say our scientific analysis has produced an age range.Can we narrow it down?

Could we look for similar styles or motives?You know, try to find things common to one time period.

We do that all the time.And When we see similarities in pieces of art, we assume some connection in time or place.But is it possible that we could be imposing our own values on that analysis?

Em, sorry, I don't get your point.

Well, we have all kinds of preconceived ideas about how artistic styles develop.For example, a lot of people think the presence of details demonstrates that the work was done by a more sophisticated artist.While a lack of detail suggests a primitive style.But trends in art in the last century or so certainly challenge that idea.Don't get me wrong though, analyzing the styles of prehistoric artifacts can help dating them.But we need to be careful with the idea that artistic development occurs in a staight line, from simple to complex representations.

What your are saying is, I mean, I get the feeling that this is like a legal process, like building a legal case, the more pieces of evidence we have, the closer we get to the truth.

Great analogy.And now you can see why we don't have an exact date for our sculpture "the lady with the hood".                                                        


Question 1
What is the talk mainly about?
核心词汇提示文字

网友解析

  • 用户头像

    恩恩耶 发表于 2018-08-22 13:44:08

    Amy:Why don’t we know the exact date when this head was made? Professor:That’s a fair question. We are talking about prehistory here. So obviously the artists didn't put a signature or a date on anything they did. So how do we know when this figure was carved? 老师对AMY的提问表示赞许,并且就这个问题展开讨论。

    • (0)
    • |
    • 举报

题目讨论

    TPO 17-listen
    马上开始精听

    标题图标听力排行榜

    • 头像
      • TPO1
      • 笑同学
      • 得分:30分
      • 小图标初来乍到
    • 头像
      • TPO2
      • 308502nlkfg
      • 得分:30分
      • 小图标初来乍到
    • 头像
      • TPO3
      • 得分:30分
      • 小图标初来乍到
    • 4 .kristina6812 30分
    • 5 .alright 30分
    • 6 .683228sylbs 29分
    • 7 .cccoo 29分
    • 8 . 29分
    • 9 . 29分
    • 10 .lo 29分
    • 11 .835297wedec 29分
    • 12 .eugeniaXIA 29分
    • 13 .2095453331 29分
    • 14 .306581mh 29分
    • 15 .210878x 29分
    • 16 .Illona_Li 29分
    • 17 .903179f 29分
    • 18 .chaoyang 29分
    • 19 . 29分
    • 20 .Numnumnum 29分
    • 21 . 27分
    • 22 .木炎 27分
    • 23 . 27分
    • 24 .wendyhjw 27分
    • 25 .我是奥利奥 27分
    • 26 .518159szhq 27分
    • 27 .你的小仙女. 27分
    • 28 .士多啤梨鸭 27分
    • 29 . 27分
    • 30 .Oldlady 27分
    • 31 .656243oh 27分
    • 32 . 27分
    • 33 .Jacklyn 27分
    • 34 .179017zyy 27分
    • 35 . 27分
    • 36 .204010b 27分
    • 37 .217551ehore 27分
    • 38 .小糖包 27分
    • 39 .怒考800分 27分
    • 40 .贝朵皮 27分
    • 41 .732428erue 26分
    • 42 .adojoqmd 26分
    • 43 .ricey 26分
    • 44 . 26分
    • 45 .DG 26分
    • 46 .799688tg 26分
    • 47 .618413fud 26分
    • 48 .abccccccc 26分
    • 49 .蓝莓大西瓜 26分
    • 50 . 26分
    查看详情图片

    联系雷哥托福

    全国免费咨询热线:400 1816 180

    预约托福考试规划师