log图标

toefl.viplgw.cn

  • 使用手机注册
  • 使用邮箱注册
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

已有账号? 登录到雷哥托福
log图标
  • 使用手机找回密码
  • 使用邮箱找回密码
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

加入生词本

listen

英['lɪs(ə)n] 美['lɪsn]
vi. 听,倾听;听从,听信
n. 听,倾听

已添加
×

我要举报草莓小菇凉评论

用户头像
草莓小菇凉:说的非常好,十分有道理,棒棒棒!

06-08 15:44:55

请选择举报类型:

举报电话:400 1816 180    举报QQ:2095453331
×
logo图标
分享到雷哥托福

分享成功图标分享成功

邀请名师点评成功,管理员正在安排老师进行点评。

继续做题 返回首页
支付雷豆失败图标 雷豆余额不足 购买雷豆 返回
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消

下载雷哥托福APP

你的托福备考神器

雷哥托福

雷哥网托福APP

你的托福备考神器

去下载

题库>阅读-11814 -Official-11

请联系小助手查看完整题目

(微信号:lgwKY2001)

In order to understand ancient Egyptian art, it is vital to know as much as possible of the elite Egyptians' view of the world and the functions and contexts of the art produced for them. Without this knowledge we can appreciate only the formal content of Egyptian art, and we will fail to understand why it was produced or the concepts that shaped it and caused it to adopt its distinctive forms. In fact, a lack of understanding concerning the purposes of Egyptian art has often led it to be compared unfavorably with the art of other cultures: Why did the Egyptians not develop sculpture in which the body turned and twisted through space like classical Greek statuary? Why do the artists seem to get left and right confused? And why did they not discover the geometric perspective as European artists did in the Renaissance? The answer to such questions has nothing to do with a lack of skill or imagination on the part of Egyptian artists and everything to do with the purposes for which they were producing their art.

The majority of three-dimensional representations, whether standing, seated, or kneeling, exhibit what is called frontality: they face straight ahead, neither twisting nor turning. When such statues are viewed in isolation, out of their original context and without knowledge of their function, it is easy to criticize them for their rigid attitudes that remained unchanged for three thousand years. Frontality is, however, directly related to the functions of Egyptian statuary and the contexts in which the statues were set up. Statues were created not for their decorative effect but to play a primary role in the cults of the gods, the king, and the dead. They were designed to be put in places where these beings could manifest themselves in order to be the recipients of ritual actions. Thus it made sense to show the statue looking ahead at what was happening in front of it, so that the living performer of the ritual could interact with the divine or deceased recipient. Very often such statues were enclosed in rectangular shrines or wall niches whose only opening was at the front, making it natural for the statue to display frontality. Other statues were designed to be placed within an architectural setting, for instance, in front of the monumental entrance gateways to temples known as pylons, or in pillared courts, where they would be placed against or between pillars: their frontality worked perfectly within the architectural context.

Statues were normally made of stone, wood, or metal. Stone statues were worked from single rectangular blocks of material and retained the compactness of the original shape. The stone between the arms and the body and between the legs in standing figures or the legs and the seat in seated ones was not normally cut away. From a practical aspect this protected the figures against breakage and psychologically gives the images a sense of strength and power, usually enhanced by a supporting back pillar. By contrast, wooden statues were carved from several pieces of wood that were pegged together to form the finished work, and metal statues were either made by wrapping sheet metal around a wooden core or cast by the lost wax process. The arms could be held away from the body and carry separate items in their hands; there is no back pillar. The effect is altogether lighter and freer than that achieved in stone, but because both perform the same function, formal wooden and metal statues still display frontality.

Apart from statues representing deities, kings, and named members of the elite that can be called formal, there is another group of three-dimensional representations that depicts generic figures, frequently servants, from the nonelite population. The function of these is quite different. Many are made to be put in the tombs of the elite in order to serve the tomb owners in the afterlife. Unlike formal statues that are limited to static poses of standing, sitting, and kneeling, these figures depict a wide range of actions, such as grinding grain, baking bread, producing pots, and making music, and they are shown in appropriate poses, bending and squatting as they carry out their tasks.

According to paragraph 3, which of the following statements about wooden statues is true?

  • Statues were normally made of stone, wood, or metal. Stone statues were worked from single rectangular blocks of material and retained the compactness of the original shape.  A Wooden statues were usually larger than stone statues. B Wooden statues were made from a single piece of wood. C Wooden statues contained pieces of metal or stone attached to the front. D Wooden statues had a different effect on the viewer than stone statues.
正确答案: D

网友解析

当前版本由 更新于2018-08-27 16:17:24 感谢由 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

如果以wooden statues做关键词,可能需要大量阅读,所以用排除法。A的larger错,原文没说二者谁大谁小; 根据倒数第三句话,证明BC错, By contrast, wooden statues were carved from several pieces of wood that were pegged together to form the finished workk, and metal statues were either made by wrapping sheet metal around a wooden core or cast by the lost wax process. 原文说木质雕塑是由多块拼接而成的,和B的single pieces矛盾;C错,原文说metal的是由wooden的核包了外皮做的,没说有金属附着在前面,属于概念偷换; D对,而wooden的effect是最后一句说的: The effect is altogether lighter and freer than that achieved in stone, but because both perform the same function, formal wooden and metal statues still display frontality. 这里强调了和石雕相比,木雕更加lighter and freer,所以不同,而且by contrast也说明两者是对照关系。

当前版本由 joannazz 更新于2018-01-03 14:35:19 感谢由 joannazz 对此题目的解答所做出的贡献。

事实信息题 解析:wooden statues在By contrast后,A没说;B与原文相反,原文说是carved from several pieces,而非a single piece;C没说;D在The effect is lighter and freer than... in stone,说明是不同的。选D

我有更好解析

取消

提交

题目讨论 (0条评论)

题库>阅读-11814 -Official-11

请联系小助手查看完整题目

(微信号:lgwKY2001)

In order to understand ancient Egyptian art, it is vital to know as much as possible of the elite Egyptians' view of the world and the functions and contexts of the art produced for them. Without this knowledge we can appreciate only the formal content of Egyptian art, and we will fail to understand why it was produced or the concepts that shaped it and caused it to adopt its distinctive forms. In fact, a lack of understanding concerning the purposes of Egyptian art has often led it to be compared unfavorably with the art of other cultures: Why did the Egyptians not develop sculpture in which the body turned and twisted through space like classical Greek statuary? Why do the artists seem to get left and right confused? And why did they not discover the geometric perspective as European artists did in the Renaissance? The answer to such questions has nothing to do with a lack of skill or imagination on the part of Egyptian artists and everything to do with the purposes for which they were producing their art.

The majority of three-dimensional representations, whether standing, seated, or kneeling, exhibit what is called frontality: they face straight ahead, neither twisting nor turning. When such statues are viewed in isolation, out of their original context and without knowledge of their function, it is easy to criticize them for their rigid attitudes that remained unchanged for three thousand years. Frontality is, however, directly related to the functions of Egyptian statuary and the contexts in which the statues were set up. Statues were created not for their decorative effect but to play a primary role in the cults of the gods, the king, and the dead. They were designed to be put in places where these beings could manifest themselves in order to be the recipients of ritual actions. Thus it made sense to show the statue looking ahead at what was happening in front of it, so that the living performer of the ritual could interact with the divine or deceased recipient. Very often such statues were enclosed in rectangular shrines or wall niches whose only opening was at the front, making it natural for the statue to display frontality. Other statues were designed to be placed within an architectural setting, for instance, in front of the monumental entrance gateways to temples known as pylons, or in pillared courts, where they would be placed against or between pillars: their frontality worked perfectly within the architectural context.

Statues were normally made of stone, wood, or metal. Stone statues were worked from single rectangular blocks of material and retained the compactness of the original shape. The stone between the arms and the body and between the legs in standing figures or the legs and the seat in seated ones was not normally cut away. From a practical aspect this protected the figures against breakage and psychologically gives the images a sense of strength and power, usually enhanced by a supporting back pillar. By contrast, wooden statues were carved from several pieces of wood that were pegged together to form the finished work, and metal statues were either made by wrapping sheet metal around a wooden core or cast by the lost wax process. The arms could be held away from the body and carry separate items in their hands; there is no back pillar. The effect is altogether lighter and freer than that achieved in stone, but because both perform the same function, formal wooden and metal statues still display frontality.

Apart from statues representing deities, kings, and named members of the elite that can be called formal, there is another group of three-dimensional representations that depicts generic figures, frequently servants, from the nonelite population. The function of these is quite different. Many are made to be put in the tombs of the elite in order to serve the tomb owners in the afterlife. Unlike formal statues that are limited to static poses of standing, sitting, and kneeling, these figures depict a wide range of actions, such as grinding grain, baking bread, producing pots, and making music, and they are shown in appropriate poses, bending and squatting as they carry out their tasks.

According to paragraph 3, which of the following statements about wooden statues is true?

正确答案: D

网友解析

写解析

更新于2018-08-27 16:17:24

如果以wooden statues做关键词,可能需要大量阅读,所以用排除法。A的larger错,原文没说二者谁大谁小; 根据倒数第三句话,证明BC错, By contrast, wooden statues were carved from several pieces of wood that were pegged together to form the finished workk, and metal statues were either made by wrapping sheet metal around a wooden core or cast by the lost wax process. 原文说木质雕塑是由多块拼接而成的,和B的single pieces矛盾;C错,原文说metal的是由wooden的核包了外皮做的,没说有金属附着在前面,属于概念偷换; D对,而wooden的effect是最后一句说的: The effect is altogether lighter and freer than that achieved in stone, but because both perform the same function, formal wooden and metal statues still display frontality. 这里强调了和石雕相比,木雕更加lighter and freer,所以不同,而且by contrast也说明两者是对照关系。

joannazz 更新于2018-01-03 14:35:19

事实信息题 解析:wooden statues在By contrast后,A没说;B与原文相反,原文说是carved from several pieces,而非a single piece;C没说;D在The effect is lighter and freer than... in stone,说明是不同的。选D

题目讨论 (0条评论)

小伙伴,有什么疑惑or做题思路,写这里!
立即评论

热门活动

  • 听力 2023托福改革全面解读

    老师:chloe

    时间:3月30日 14:30-15:00

  • 听力 托福口语体验课

    老师:chloe

    时间:3月9日 14:00-15:00

  • 听力 托福写作体验课

    老师:jessica

    时间: 3月2日 17:00-18:00

回复评论

复制评论

解析提交成功,正在审核中

知道了

您已提交评论成功

确定

答案都没有怎么前进?

知道了

此来源单项已做完

知道了

是否确认删除?

取消

删除