关闭图标
log图标

toefl.viplgw.cn

  • 使用手机注册
  • 使用邮箱注册
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

已有账号? 登录到雷哥托福
关闭图标
log图标
  • 使用手机找回密码
  • 使用邮箱找回密码
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

又想起来了
加入生词本

listen

英['lɪs(ə)n] 美['lɪsn]
vi. 听,倾听;听从,听信
n. 听,倾听

已添加
×

我要举报草莓小菇凉评论

用户头像
草莓小菇凉:说的非常好,十分有道理,棒棒棒!

06-08 15:44:55

请选择举报类型:

举报电话:400 1816 180    举报QQ:2095453331
×
logo图标
分享到雷哥托福

分享成功图标分享成功

邀请名师点评成功,管理员正在安排老师进行点评。

继续做题 返回首页
支付雷豆失败图标 雷豆余额不足 购买雷豆 返回
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消

文章结构

TPO 30-L1 .Metacognition 点击收藏

标准

  • 高音
  • 静音
  • 句子
    精听
  • 全文
    精听
  • 听写
    模式
  • 点击查看本句

    听写本句 再播一遍 下一句
  • 点击查看全文

    再播一遍本文

    Listen to part of a lecture in a psychology class.

    We've been talking about animal cognition - the study of animal intelligence.

    Now, much of the research in this area is motivated by the search for animal analogues, or parallels to human cognitive processes.

    And one of the processes we've been investigating is metacognition.

    What is metacognition? Well, it's being aware of what one knows or feels, uh, um... having an awareness of one's state of mind.

    And making decisions about behavior based on what one knows.

    Researchers have long been interested in whether animals possess this capability, but... but couldn't test it because animals aren't able to report their feelings.

    But recently one group of researchers found a way to solve this problem.

    They did studies with... with monkeys and dolphins that provide evidence that these animals have the ability to feel uncertainty, to feel unsure about something and... and... well, to know that they are uncertain.

    So how could these researchers figure out if an animal feels uncertainty.

    Well, it began with a study one of them did on a dolphin, who had been trained to recognize a particular high-pitched tone.

    The dolphin was taught to press one of two paddles depending on whether it heard the high tone or one that was lower.

    Food was a reward for a correct response.

    But if the wrong paddle was pressed, the dolphin had to wait several seconds before it could try again.

    The task varied in difficulty according to the pitch of the second tone.

    The closer it came in pitch to the first one, the harder it became for the dolphin to correctly identify it as low.

    And the researcher noted that the dolphin was quite eager to press the paddle when it was sure of the answer, but exhibited hesitation during difficult trials.

    Next the researcher introduced a third option, a third paddle that would initiate a new trial, giving the dolphin the choice of passing on difficult trials.

    Once the dolphin figured out the result of pressing this new paddle, it did choose it frequently when the trial was difficult.

    The researcher took that as an indication that the animal wanted to pass because it didn't know the answer and knew it didn't know.

    But there was a problem.

    Other researchers protested that the... the opt-out response was simply a learned or conditioned response.

    You remember intro to psychology, right?

    In other words, by pressing the pass paddle, the dolphin avoided having to wait and hasten the possibility of a full reward by moving directly to the next trial.

    So the experiment didn't necessarily indicate that the dolphin had knowledge of its own uncertainty, just that it wanted to avoid negative consequences.

    So more recently, our researcher and his colleagues devised a new study, this time using monkeys.

    In this experiment, the monkeys had to identify certain patterns displayed on a computer screen.

    These patterns were analogous to the tones used in the dolphin study.

    One type of pattern was of a specific density and was to be classified as dense, while the second type of pattern could vary in density, but was always less dense than the first one.

    And the monkeys' task was to identify this second type as sparse.

    So the denser the second type of pattern was, the more difficult the task became.

    And as in a previous study, the monkeys were given a third choice that would allow them to pass on to a new trial.

    But unlike in the dolphin experiment, the monkeys had to complete four trials before they got any feedback.

    They didn't know if they responded correctly or incorrectly after each trial because there was no reward or punishment.

    At the end of four trials, feedback was given.

    The monkeys received a full reward for each correct response.

    And a time-out during which a buzzer was sounded for each incorrect response.

    But the monkeys had no way to tell which reward or punishment was associated with which response.

    And they didn't get either reward or punishment for choosing the pass option, the... um... the uncertainty response.

    But nevertheless they still chose this option in the appropriate circumstances when the trial was particularly difficult.

    And this is evidence that it wasn't simply a conditioned response, because that response didn't guarantee a faster reward.

    So what does all this tell us about animal consciousness or animals' awareness of themselves and their state of mind?

    Can we really know what's going on in the minds of animals?

    No. Of course not.

    But exploring the metacognitive capacity of animals could become an important criterion in highlighting the similarities and differences between human and animal minds.

    • special
    ☞查看答案 再播一遍

联系雷哥托福

全国免费咨询热线:400 1816 180

预约托福考试规划师