关闭图标
log图标

toefl.viplgw.cn

  • 使用手机注册
  • 使用邮箱注册
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    用户名不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

已有账号? 登录到雷哥托福
关闭图标
log图标
  • 使用手机找回密码
  • 使用邮箱找回密码
  • 手机号不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

  • 邮箱不能为空!

    验证码不能为空!

    密码不能为空!

又想起来了
加入生词本

listen

英['lɪs(ə)n] 美['lɪsn]
vi. 听,倾听;听从,听信
n. 听,倾听

已添加
×

我要举报草莓小菇凉评论

用户头像
草莓小菇凉:说的非常好,十分有道理,棒棒棒!

06-08 15:44:55

请选择举报类型:

举报电话:400 1816 180    举报QQ:2095453331
×
logo图标
分享到雷哥托福

分享成功图标分享成功

邀请名师点评成功,管理员正在安排老师进行点评。

继续做题 返回首页
支付雷豆失败图标 雷豆余额不足 购买雷豆 返回
报告题目错误
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消

文章结构

TPO 08-L4 .The Periodic Table of Elements 点击收藏

标准

  • 高音
  • 静音
  • 句子
    精听
  • 全文
    精听
  • 听写
    模式
  • 点击查看本句

    听写本句 再播一遍 下一句
  • 点击查看全文

    再播一遍本文

    Listen to part of a lecture in the chemistry class. The professor has been discussing the periodic table of elements.

    So are there any questions?

    Yes, em, professor Harrison, you were saying that the periodic table is predictive.

    What exactly does that mean?

    I mean I understand how it organizes the elements but where is the prediction?

    OK, let's look at periodic table again.

    OK, it groups elements into categories that share certain properties, right?

    Um-huh~

    And it's arranged according to increasing atomic number, which is..

    The number of protons in each atom of an element.

    Right, well, early versions of the periodic table had gaps, missing elements.

    Every time you had one more proton, you had another element, and then, oops, there have been atomic number, for which there is no known element, and the prediction was that the elements, with that atomic number existed somewhere, but it just hadn't been found yet.

    And its location in the table would tell you what properties it should have.

    It was really pretty exciting for scientists at that time to find these missing elements and confirm their predictive properties.

    Um, actually, that reminds me of other very good example of all these, element 43.

    See on the table, the symbols for element 42 and 44.

    Well, in early versions of the table, there was no symbol for element 43 protons because no element with 43 protons had been discovered yet.

    So the periodic table had a gap between elements 42 and 44.

    And then, in 1925, a team of chemists led by a scientist named Ida Tack claimed that they had found element 43.

    They had been using a relatively new technology called "X-rays spectroscopy", and they were using this to examine an ore sample, and they claimed that they'd found an element with 43 protons and they named it Masurium.

    Um, professor Harrison, then, how come in my periodic table, here, element 43 is TC, that's technetium, right?

    OK, let me add that.

    Actually, um, that's the point I'm coming to.

    Hardly anyone believed that Tack has discovered the new element.

    X-ray spectroscopy was a new method at that time.

    And they were never able to isolate enough Masurium to have weighable sample to convince everyone of the discovery.

    So they were discredited.

    But then, 12 years later in 1937, a different team became the first to synthesize the element using a cyclotron, and that element had...

    43 Protons?

    That's right, but they named it Technetium to emphasize that it was artificially created with technology.

    And people thought that synthesizing this element, making it artificially was the only way to get it.

    We still haven't found it currently in nature.

    Now, element 43 what they called Masurium or Technetium is radioactive.

    Why is that matter? What's true of radioactive element?

    It decays, it turns into other elements?

    Oh, so does that explain why it was missing in the periodic table?

    Exactly. Because of its radioactive decay, element 43 doesn't last very long.

    And therefore, if it ever had been present on earth, it would have decayed ages ago.

    So the Masurium people were obviously wrong, and the Technetium people were right, right?

    Well, that was then, now we know that element 43 does occur naturally.

    It can be naturally generated from Uranium atom that has spontaneously split.

    And guess what?

    The ore sample the Masurium group was working with had plenty of Uranium in it, enough to split into measurable amounts of Masurium.

    So Tack's team might very well have found small amounts of Masurium in the ore sample.It's just that once it was generated from split Uranium it decayed very quickly.

    And you know, here is an incredible irony.

    Ida Tack, the chemist led the Masurium team, when she was the first to suggest that Uranium could break up into smaller pieces but she didn't know that that was the defense of her own discovery of element 43.

    So is my version of the periodic table wrong?

    Should element 43 really be called Masurium?

    Maybe, but you know it‘s hard to tell for sure after all this time, if Ida Tack’s group did discover element 43.

    They didn't, um, publish enough detail on their methods or instruments for us to know for sure.

    But I'd like to think that element 43 was discovered twice, as Masurium, it was the first element discovered that occurs in nature only from spontaneous fission, and as Technetium, it was the first element discovered in laboratory.

    And of course, it was an element the periodic table let us to expect existed before anyone had found it or made it.

    • special
    ☞查看答案 再播一遍

联系雷哥托福

全国免费咨询热线:400 1816 180

预约托福考试规划师